<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>danmcdonough.com &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danmcdonough.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danmcdonough.com</link>
	<description>chairman &#38; chief executive of elauwit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:26:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with the auto industry? Stupid, old rules.</title>
		<link>http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/06/04/whats-wrong-with-the-auto-industry-stupid-old-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/06/04/whats-wrong-with-the-auto-industry-stupid-old-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/06/04/whats-wrong-with-the-auto-industry-stupid-old-rules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
via wired.com
This piece by Wired explains how Detroit would fare much better if it operated in a retail environment much more the way Apple does. This would mean eliminating the fiefdoms of dealerships. 
Of course, the dealerships want nothing of it. But it seems to me the alternative is annihilation of an industry. 
This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/06/04/whats-wrong-with-the-auto-industry-stupid-old-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charging for news: Will people pay?</title>
		<link>http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/06/03/charging-for-news-will-people-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/06/03/charging-for-news-will-people-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/06/03/charging-for-news-will-people-pay/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
For the meeting, the American Press Institute also prepared a “Newspaper Economic Action Plan” that detailed “models and recommendations” for charging for online content.
via niemanlab.org
The folks at the Nieman Journalism Lab got their hands on a report that explains how newspapers should be charging for content. I read the report. Seems to me that without [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/06/03/charging-for-news-will-people-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>14 bold and clever plays in advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/05/27/14-bold-and-clever-plays-in-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/05/27/14-bold-and-clever-plays-in-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/05/27/14-bold-and-clever-plays-in-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
via toxel.com
3M gets the prize from me for the boldest play. That&#8217;s a whole lot of cash to put out there in the open. Click through on the picture to see some other clever approaches.

  Posted via web   from quick hits from dan  
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.danmcdonough.com/2009/05/27/14-bold-and-clever-plays-in-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
